To maintain the equilibrium in a society, penalties for inexcusable offences should have the same severity of the crime, sometimes death penalty. However, death penalty stands against the human rights, according to many. All the living creatures have the right to live and should get a second chance - criminals or not. Societies use the legislative system to prosecute a criminal and the verdict cannot be hundred percent fair always. To prevent any wrongdoing from the law itself, the criminal can be given solitary confinement and long prison sentences.
In conclusion, even though capital punishment help reduce crime rates in our society and it is required to prevent harsh offences, the death penalty is a violation of human rights. So, I feel that capital punishments should be given in heinous crimes after being absolutely sure. Essay Vocabulary Topics Related Vocabulary. Model Answer 2: Agreement: Capital punishment is essential to control violence in society.
Nowadays, the crime rate is accelerating according to many surveys. To rein this situation, there should be a mechanism in place like jail for lifetime and death penalty based on the severity of the crime. The government should enforce such laws to create a high alert around the society and endorse a secure ruling to its people. Many incidents are the best examples of imbalanced society values in the recent days. Those are like killing someone's own mother or a plan to murder the best friend due to immaturity. If there is no mechanism to stop such kind of incidents would severely impact the society livelihood.
Hence, capital punishment is mandatory to implicate a fear among the people who create such violence and which ensures the peaceful life of innocent people.
In fact, I believe the death penalty is the only way to punish the criminals as they commit serious crimes which directly aid in controlling the violence at least to some extent. For instance, recently a group of five men brutally raped and murdered a woman in the broad daylight. Due to that, the high court had punished death penalty to that group which has created a sensation as the capital punishment is very rare in my country and social volunteers said the crime rate is gradually decreasing after that incident. Thus, violence is effectively controlled if the capital punishment is endorsed by a society.
In some society, the crime is so violent and severer that the government and the law enforcing authority have to handle that strictly. As a result, they do not have any alternative other than imposing capital punishment. This message is strongly needed in some society to control the crime rate.
The theme that someone who murdered another human will regret someday and after few years would lead a dignified and free life when the relatives and family members of the victim would remorse forever. What punishment do you have in your mind if someone is a psychopathic killer and is out of redemption? Minor punishment and reformation facility? This does not just make sense. To summarise, capital punishment is important to bring down the crime ratio and to also provide the secured life.
Otherwise, ambience in the society will disturb which is not recommended for the common man. Hence, it is advisable to imply such punishment which leads a peaceful life with less violence in these days and also in the future. The argument about the capital punishment or death penalty is a very controversial one. Some people think that without death penalty it is impossible to retain the law and order in a country while others stand totally against the capital punishment and describe it as inhuman.
Both sides have their logic to support their opinion. In my opinion, capital punishment should be only used in a situation where there is no other alternative. Otherwise, penalties rather than death should be tried to punish anyone.
Capital punishment is the process of killing the offenders for the crimes they have committed. Capital punishment was very prominent in old days but these days capital punishment is diminishing and the authorities are opting for a less barbaric way to punish the criminals. I too agree with the alternative way of punishment which is less severe than death. There are various arguments for supporting or opposing it which I will be discussing in this essay. Opponents of the death penalty, like me, say that capital punishment is not a solution.
First of all, the human has no right to kill another human for any reason, no matter how severe the crime is. My second argument against this is some crimes are committed by mentally sick people. Those people are not responsible for their deeds. They can be put in safer hospitals for their rest of life.
Moreover, it may happen that the offender has been convicted and executed wrongly. Later upon further investigation, he is proved to be innocent. We don't have any way to roll this back. Somebody might lose their precious life which is not at all acceptable.
In London, a criminal was proved not guilty after 15 years; if he had been executed nobody could have done justice to his life. At last, there are various alternatives available; for instance, life sentences. These alternatives also serve the similar purpose of making criminals realise their mistakes.
However, proponents say that criminals should be shot dead for their mistakes. Why should the government bear the expenses of criminals in the jails? The criminals should not be granted anything less than this death punishment. In conclusion, I don't agree and believe in this death punishment as we always have a less severe alternative available.
We should avoid the capital punishment death penalty and try to make our society more humane one. Alternative Answer 5: Mixed Opinion. I think, imposing the death penalty as a punishment to all criminals to reduce crime have been a constant subject of debate all the world in recent years. As the generations pass on, the way people thoughts regarding issues related good and bad also changed.
As technology goes on improving day by day it serves for both positive and negative purposes. So, ultimately some people think that capital punishment is the only way to make lives more secure resulting decrements violence in society. I strongly believe that imposing of punishment should be appropriate to the crime that had been done. Firstly, there are many crimes that jeopardise the lives of society. Crimes like religious wars, cyber crimes, robbery, addiction to drugs etc. All these crimes start with a single person who involves many innocent people to have a role in a crime scene.
So, assigning death penalty to all criminals is not correct and not possible too. So, head of the gang should be taken into custody and taught moral values to make hims a different person who promotes peace. For, instance, the cybercrime is common nowadays, to control it control its initial steps to be taken to catch the criminal and investigate to find out the purpose of crime. So, if a crime was done deliberately then imprisonment for a particular period is enough. Secondly, there are few other crimes which disturb society's peacefulness.
Oct 12, Camus also argued that the threat of death is insufficient to prevent people from committing crimes as death is the common fate shared by all, regardless of guilt. In the death penalty was abolished in France , the last execution having taken place four years earlier in Marseille. Such unfair sentences take away lives of innocent people and make other citizens lose faith in law and justice. Currently fifty-eight nations practice the death penalty. Crime is afterall a crime, irrespective of how big or small it is.
Crimes like terrorism, Murders, Gang rape etc. These are the crimes which will have adverse effects threatening the lives of innocent people. For example, the great scientist Noble, invented dynamite for a useful purpose to blast the hills to solve transport problems but it was mishandled by few people. In the 21th century our criminals laws should now reflect a higher standard that an eye for an eye.
In current times, the death penalty can no longer be claimed as an efficient form of retribution. There are huge delays in carrying out the executions of an inmate.
Statistics show that there is over an eight-year wait before an execution can take place. In fact, most death row inmates die of old age, before their execution sentence.
Since , only thirteen inmates have been executed. If the trend continues, that would mean most of the inmates would die of natural causes before their execution sentence can be carried out. Those that claim the death penalty as retribution fail to take notice of the execution process in our criminal justice system. Appealing is needed in the American criminal justice system because the process is designed to protect against human errors. An average appeal can take over ten years.